|
||||||
THE TRAGEDY OF GUARDIANSHIP FRAUD How A
Fraudulent
Guardianship/Conservatorship Commences And Continues
Originally published in
PPJJ Gazette © 2010-2011, Angela V. Woodhull, Ph.D.
Used with permission of the author This essay examines
conditions in Florida but the same problems exist in many states
Step One: Eminent danger - The initial court petition
The professional
guardian [or
conservator],
with the assistance of her attorneys, commences the embezzlement process by
filing an emergency petition in the probate courts to become the "emergency"
"temporary" guardian. Florida guardianship
statutes (Chapter 744), like many states, require that there be an "eminent
danger" in order for the petitioner to become the "emergency
temporary guardian." The guardian oftentimes
fabricates the "eminent danger" by stating that there is a
neighbor or relative or stranger who is taking advantage of the elderly person.
In some cases, this may be a somewhat true statement, albeit an exaggerated
claim. In most cases, upon further investigation, there has been no "eminent
danger" whatsoever. Step One takes away all
of the victim's civil rights and therefore gives the guardian and her attorneys
full control over the victim and his or her assets. Step Two: The examining committee Once the professional
guardian has taken control of the victim on a temporary basis (the emergency
temporary guardianship order expires in 60 days [in Florida]) an examining committee of three medical
"professionals" steps in to verify the allegation of mental
incapacity. Oftentimes, the victim is administered a cocktail of psychotropic
drugs to enhance the claims that he or she is incompetent. "Ward" Elizabeth Faye Arnold,
for instance, stated, "They put me on drugs that made me feel very
drunk. I couldn't even remember my name. Now that they have all my money, they
don't medicate me that way anymore." One of the three medical
professionals must be a psychiatrist and the victim is generally always found
to be mentally incapacitated. The guardian usually has her own set of medical
professionals that she utilizes on a regular basis. For instance, one
professional guardian is married to a medical doctor and therefore has an
entire fleet of medical professional associates available to her. Back in the courtroom,
soon after the three medical professionals file their reports, there is a
capacity hearing. The victim seldom is permitted to attend this hearing. The
judge quickly scans the medical examinations that "verify"
that the victim is "mentally and/or physically incapacitated." The
judge then signs an order that gives the professional guardian full and
permanent legal authority over the victim's person and property. Step Three: The "feast" begins Property is sold for
below market value and the deeds switch and switch several times. (kick backs
are suspected). Bank accounts, annuities, stocks, and Certificates of Deposit
are liquidated into one big guardianship account. Out of this large bank
account, the guardian is expected to pay all the victim's, but bills oftentimes
go unpaid. How the victim's money is spent 1. Attorney's fees
and guardianship fees for "services rendered to 'Benefit' the 'Ward'" A large part of the victim's money is spent on attorney's fees and guardian's fees. As long as there is ample money in the victim's guardianship account, the guardian and her attorney cohorts will file motion upon motion after motion to the courts, such as:
Each motion can cost the "ward" in excess of $2,000 because the motion must be written, researched, filed, and then a hearing is scheduled. Oftentimes, the motions cost more than what is being petitioned for. The guardian frequently
doubles the monthly expenses then keeps the remainder. 3. Selling the
"Ward's" personal belongings for below market value then pocketing
the difference The guardian
underestimates the amount of the sale of personal items, such as jewelry,
paintings, and antiques, for the purpose of the court record inventories, then
is free to keep the difference. There is little and often no court oversight. Oftentimes, the bills of
the "ward" are not even paid. When the "ward"
dies, the guardian simply places an ad in an obscure newspaper, if there is
money left for an estate to be probated.Assuming creditors do not see the ad
and file a claim against the estate within 30 days, their claims are forever
barred and so the guardian was able to fool creditors and abscond with the
money and not have to pay any of the bills. If she is caught, she simply pays
the bills of the creditors who caught her. This frequently includes Medicaid. The guardian can claim a
much lower amount of liquid assets than what the victim is actually worth and
then pocket the rest.
In this scenario, the
guardian claimed that Julie Sweeten desired to leave her estate to her bank. A
forged will was entered into the record. Wachovia Bank trustee was then given
$80,000 from the uncontested, probated estate. Step Four: The mysterious deaths Once the funds have been
spent, the "ward" oftentimes suddenly dies. The "ward"
dies when there is still plenty of money - if a huge probate battle can
commence, thereby further enriching the attorneys and guardian.
NASGA, National Association to Stop Guardianship Abuse, has adopted a three
part theme to succinctly describe the legally sanctioned exploitative
guardianship process: "Isolate, Medicate, Take the Estate." Predatory
guardians: How courts are allowing professional guardians/conservators to rob
your assets
When you hear the word "professional
guardian," what do you think? Do you think of someone who protects the
elderly? Assists them with their daily needs? Guarantees they are protected
from financial exploitation and physical neglect? The pristine image of
professional court-appointed guardians who allegedly protect the elderly is
being challenged. Grass root organizations, such as the National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse (N.A.S.G.A.) and Advocates
for National Guardianship Ethics and Reform (A.N.G.E.R.) are claiming that
professional guardians, their attorneys - and even judges - need to be watched. • May 25, 2010.
Latifa Ring of Elder Abuse Victims Advocates addressed the Committee
on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security
stating, "... exploitation in guardianships is rampant. It is largely
kept out of the public eye under the guise of 'protection.'" "Family members are
portrayed as "Osama Bin Laden" or the devil incarnate," David Newman said, a
guardian reform advocate. These "unproven
and often false allegations" commence a flurry of legal activity that
can only be likened to Charles Dickinson's Bleakhouse. While family members
are forced to spend thousands of dollars defending themselves against the false
accusations, these same accusers - oftentimes, the professional guardians–
handsomely profit from the legal havoc they create. The guardians need to
be watched Take, for example, the
recently widely publicized case of Clay Greene and Harold Scull, a gay couple who had
cogently cohabitated together for more than 20 years, rendering mutual durable
powers of attorney, wills, and other legal declarations upon one another. When
Scull, 89, unexpectedly fell onto a stone patio, paramedics were called and the
local sheriff department hastily alleged that Greene had intentionally shoved
Scull to the ground. Yet, despite the fact that all charges were subsequently
dropped, the public guardianship office for Sonoma County used the already
disproved physical abuse allegation to commence an involuntary guardianship
against Scull. Scull was removed to a nursing home, isolated him from Greene,
and the couple's jointly owned property which included valuable paintings,
expensive Persian rugs, antiques, silverware, jewelry, and real estate - was
sold for far less than appraised value - at least according to the court
records. It was later discovered that the items had been sold for far more by
the public guardianship office. These types of guardianship
irregularities have sparked a guardianship task force Special Committee on Aging, which reported, "...guardianship...has
the potential of harming older adults rather than protecting
them...The...continuing reports of the failure of courts...to prevent
[financial] exploitation of incapacitated adults by their guardians have long
been of concern to this Committee." Greene sued the public
guardianship office who settled with him for approximately $600,000.00 just
days before trial. Amy Todd-Gher, Greene's attorney, stated: "This victory sends an unmistakable message
that all elders must be treated with respect and dignity...and that those who
mistreat elders must be held accountable. [But] Even as we celebrate this
victory...we are deeply troubled that the Sonoma [County] continues to refuse
to take responsibility for their egregious misconduct...We urge every
citizen...to demand more oversight of the Public Guardian's office. They need
to be watched." Is elder financial
exploitation by professional guardians and their attorneys a commonplace
occurrence? According to John Caravella, a former detective and office manager
for Seniors vs. Crime, a special project of
the Florida Attorney General's Office, Gainesville, Florida, the answer is "Yes."
Caravella became
simultaneously intrigued and disturbed by the court-sanctioned practices of
professional guardians on their "wards" (the legal term dubbed
to those who have lost all of their civil rights under court-mandated
guardianship) when one of his neighbors mysteriously disappeared shortly after
receiving an inheritance of more than a quarter of a million dollars. The
neighbor, referred to as "Adelle" in Caravella's book, Marked for Destruction, had been falsely
induced by a stock broker, whom she had consulted about her fledgling
inheritance money, to sign papers that authorized a professional guardian and
her attorney to manage Adele's finances - if she should become mentally
incapacitated. Within a few weeks, the guardian and her attorney petitioned the
court alleging that Adele was not competent to manage her own affairs. The
court authorized that she be stripped of all of her civil rights and placed in
a nursing home. Soon thereafter, Adele's recently acquired $250,000+ was
quickly consumed by the attorney and guardian for "professional
services" fees. And Adele soon passed away. Kevin Gallagher had a
trusted, longstanding pact with his beloved parents: When the time was "right,"
he would make arrangements for their safe return to Maine where they would
reside in assisted living. That "right time" came unexpectedly
one day after Sunday services when Robert and Elsa Gallagher became slightly
disoriented in traffic when they happenchanced upon orange cones in a road
detour. Kevin and Lisa, delighted to hear that their parents were ready to
journey home, began making all of the necessary arrangements. Kevin even phoned
his estranged Orlando-based sister, Lori, and asked if she would simply "telephone"
Mom and Dad during the interim. The sister, however, consulted the Yellow Pages
and telephoned a company, Geriatric Care Management, that specializes in elder
care. Within 48 hours a
professional guardian, and owner of the elder care company, arrived at the
Gallagher's doorstep with a court order and two deputy sheriffs. She had
hastily petitioned to become the couple's "emergency temporary
guardian" after learning of their substantive assets. Upon her
arrival, the couple were forcefully removed from their home and placed in
separate nursing home facilities. Mrs. Gallagher, hysterical, secretly phoned
her daughter-in-law, her speech slurred, crying for help. She had been forcibly
administered psychotropic drugs. Three medical professionals quickly examined
her while under the influence of the narcotics, and declared both she and her
husband simultaneously 100% mentally incapacitated. The temporary guardian was
then quickly appointed the permanent, plenary guardian. The guardians first move
was to encumber all of the couple's assets. Instead of making
arrangements for their safe return home, Kevin Gallagher suddenly found himself
furiously searching for Florida attorneys. Meanwhile, the guardian's legal
counsel quickly filed papers to block Kevin's attempts at removing his parents
from Florida to Maine. A hotly contested guardianship soon commenced with
attorneys from both sides legally authorized to generously pay themselves from
the Gallaghers' assets. "The story is
always the same," states Newman, a guardianship reform advocate. "A
family member fights the guardianship; then the family member later 'wins' the
contest - when all the assets have been spent in attorneys' fees." Three years passed.
Kevin found himself switching attorneys four times in an attempt to get the
legal nightmare to stop Then, suddenly, it did
stop. Kevin was declared the winner of the contest. All of the assets had
been spent. "They then placed
my parents on a airplane with a single suitcase with a broken zipper," Kevin stated. "Inside
the suitcase were tattered clothes that had the names of other people in Magic
Marker inside the clothes. Everything they had owned - even their clothes - had
been sold or trashed by the guardian." Both Elsa and Robert died
shortly after returning to Maine. Family feud - or - an
open invitation for fraud? Corrine Branson, 82, had
been happily living in Miami Beach with the daily assistance of a CNA when her
grandson secretly petitioned the court to become his grandmother's guardian.
When Branson learned that she was to be moved into a nursing home, she quickly
phoned her beloved daughter, aunt to the grandson, who had been granted a
springing power of attorney many years before. Bonnie Reiter, with little
knowledge of guardianships or guardianship law, quickly hired an attorney who
suggested that a "professional guardian" be appointed during
the interim legal contest. It turned out that the
guardian he suggested works with him on a regular basis. Reiter fired her
attorney, hired another, and then moved for a court hearing which her mother
planned to attend. "Two weeks prior to
the hearing, my mother ended up mysteriously dead," Reiter stated. The guardianship
remained open after Branson's death with Reiter, alone, having spent $130,000.00
in attorneys' fees. "They took more than $800,000 of my
mother's money in attorneys' fees. The guardianship, in which my mother had
never even been declared mentally incapacitated, lasted less than three months.
This is a racketeering scheme that needs to be investigated. The F.B.I. should
step in." Law enforcement agents,
social workers, and judges have been trained to maintain a watchful eye over
exploitative family members. Yet no one seems to be guarding the guardians.
Family members have complained to local law enforcement, the state attorneys'
office, and even the F.B.I.without any significant action being taken. The problems grow worse
with time as the courts become ever more dysfunctional. Dr. Angela V. Woodhull,
a licensed private investigator, spent more than two and a half years
investigating court records in Seminole and Orange Counties, Florida, and
interviewing family members and victims in order to compose this story. All
court records that verify the contents of this article were submitted as
attachments to the editor of the F.B.I. journal as verification of accuracy.
Dr. Woodhull can be reached at (352) 327-3665 or (352) 682-9033, or write her
at PO Box 14423, Gainesville, Florida 32604-2423, or email her at chachaangelina@yahoo.com. Dr. Woodhull is a
licensed private investigator and the author of Police Communication in Traffic
Stops
and Private Investigation Strategies and
Techniques. Advocates for
National Guardianship Ethics and Reform (A.N.G.E.R.) Elder Abuse Victims Advocates - For national guardianship
reform. General Accounting
Office (GAO) report on Guardianships: Cases of Financial
Exploitation, Neglect, and Abuse of Seniors CNN Report: Probe shows court-appointed
guardians often not screened or monitored
|
|